![hikko mamittakim we kullo hikko mamittakim we kullo](https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-dwqK8rEblVM/Wlo905V4o0I/AAAAAAAAB8Y/Ya7oxgRvzVcdS9gPWgKMYghvDidJHLI3wCLcBGAs/s320/The_Absolute_Truth_About_Muhammad_in_the_Bible-1024x671.jpg)
Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly.
![hikko mamittakim we kullo hikko mamittakim we kullo](https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ZEzkuCrIyqQ/VO8rAsawZyI/AAAAAAAAEoo/zVnhKzUEGoA/s1600/1599579_1545238642396746_683051130_n.jpg)
Muhammad was a gentile because he came from the lineage of Ismael, making him an extraordinary gentile of high stature:Īnd as for Ishmael (son of Abraham), I have heard you. Anyone who is not of the Children of Israel is known to the Jews as a “Gentile.” The verse above says there will be an exception of the coming Prophet who will not be from the Children of Israel, but rather a Gentile. The Children of Israel have always believed the prophethood must stay within the bloodline of the Twelve Children of Israel (starting from the children of Jacob, who is the son of Isaac).
![hikko mamittakim we kullo hikko mamittakim we kullo](https://aboutislam.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Who-Is-Muhammadim-In-the-Song-of-Solomon.jpg)
We read ‘And the Gentiles shall come to thy light’, and that means this Holy Prophet would arise among the Gentiles and his Light would fill his place where the nations would come and visit. Let us examine the passage describing the roots of the next prophet: Was he the long awaited “Messiah” the Jews have been waiting for so many centuries? Was he the unlettered Prophet prophesied in the Old Testament? įor more than fourteen centuries, scholars from Judaism, Christianity and Islam have been discussing whether or not the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) could have indeed been a true prophet from the One True God. Say ye: We believe in Allah, and the revelation given to us, and to Abraham, Isma’il, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and that given to Moses and Jesus, and that given to (all) prophets from their Lord: We make no difference between one and another of them: And we bow to Allah.
![hikko mamittakim we kullo hikko mamittakim we kullo](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-l-c7LvQGVPg/U3ZWwcG4SJI/AAAAAAAAFFc/0izBkIMgfuQ/s1600/Writing+The+Torah.jpg)
They all come from the same father (Abraham) and follow the same prophets of the same God, yet ironically the true enemies of God have succeeded in dividing us by forcing us to focus on our differences rather than our staggering similarities. The clash between Muslims, Christians, and Jews resembles the feud that exists between siblings. You can read the complete collection at this link: įiled Under: Spirtual Tagged With: aisha, hadith, Islam, marriage, prophet muhammad Muhammad in the Bible, Torah, and Qur’an Omar Suleiman does an excellent job of breaking down this hotly debated topic, including the historical context of the time, and helps us end this debate, once and for all. The following video is the conclusion of a 4-part collection titled, “More Than Just a Number: Perspectives on the Age of Aisha (ra)”. It’s only in recent years that Islamophobes have brought it up as a point of debate, and unfortunately it has also become a cause of doubt among Muslims. It’s important to note that for over 1400 years, the age of Aisha (ra) was never a topic of discussion. So we have completely updated this page to reflect this groundbreaking research and the articles and videos they have published. Omar Suleiman and the Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research have conducted an impressive, in-depth study of this topic. Neither of these conditions are met in this case of machmadim.UPDATE April 2019: This post was originally published in 2012, and has gone through many revisions. But of course there are problems here too. A majestic plural is ALWAYS a plural pronoun, and ALWAYS first person. For example 'we are not amused', where the first person pronoun 'we' is used to refer to the speaker. Alluding to the majestic plural is an attempt to give some precedence for the claim.There is no precedence anywhere in the bible, or anywhere else in Hebrew for ending a name with 'im' as a 'plural or respect'. Furthermore, we never find the so called 'plural of respect' where respect is due. So as seen above, elohim is not a name, and we find it used even when no respect is due. Surely no muslim would be trying to suggest that a false god is given a 'plural of respect'? Nor could anybody be suggesting that these false gods have the 'name' Elohim, since we already know that their names are something else. Three other false gods (Chemosh, Ashtarte, and Milcom), and even the golden calf are referred to as 'elohim'. 5:7, a false god by the name Dagon, is referred to as an 'elohim' (a god). It is a word/title meaning 'god' (sometimes gods/judges). The problem however, is that elohim is not a name.